EVP Message
I recently listened to an interview with the Phillies announcer about the changes to Major League Baseball (MLB) that will be implemented next season. I should note that I am not really a baseball enthusiast (unless the Phillies are in the World Series!), but this conversation caught my attention because it reminded me of challenges that are facing other organizations. The merits of the MLB changes may be debatable; however, the fundamental reasons are relevancy and safety. Baseball is too slow and there is not enough action, so they are losing fans. Also, the risk of injury has increased over the years and that has become an expensive liability for the league.
It must be so hard to change the rules for a longstanding and beloved institution and, certainly, there are many fans and players that are unhappy with them. But the league is moving forward because the decision makers have done the research, the testing, and they believe this is what is best for the game.
The MLB is making the bases bigger to reduce collisions and injuries. They are also implementing a pitch timer to keep the game moving faster. Defensive shift limits will also create more ball action in the outfield. How do the MLB changes correlate to associations?
While the National Association of Enrolled Agents (NAEA) is not the MLB, we are facing similar challenges of relevancy and risk. What do we need to change to address them? These are a few observations and trends that are threatening the NAEA’s relevancy and creating risks in our current structure:
Membership has been in decline for at least one decade, yet the number of enrolled agents has not. How can we best serve enrolled agents across the globe and make the NAEA more relevant? I challenge you to step outside your own bias and how you have historically engaged with the NAEA and/or the state affiliates and think more globally. If we were starting the NAEA as a new organization today, what would it look like?